Dear Mr Hawabhay,
I am contacting your Ministry as it is the data 
processor, under the Data Protection Act, for the 
National Identity Card.  Please do let me know if 
you are not the appropriate contact.
According to the Ministry of Technology, 
Communication and Innovation, there is the 
following text in the User Declaration Form:
    "I have no objection that my fingerprint minutiae be processed and
     recorded for the purpose of producing my identity card.  I understand that
     this information will be erased permanently from the register once the
     identity card has been printed."
I have asked the Data Protection Office for 
advice about the above and it confirmed that the 
person will be providing his/her consent by signing the above.
There is a news article in June 2015 ( 
http://www.lemauricien.com/article/carte-d-identite-biometrique-des-dispositions-prises-detruire-les-banques-donnees 
) with the following: "ministère de la 
Communication, de la Technologie et de 
l’Innovation avise le public que les mesures 
suivantes seront prises".  I could not find the 
announcement when I visited the web site of the 
Ministry of Technology, Communication and Innovation to verify it.
I read in another news article ( 
https://www.lexpress.mu/article/268270/lancienne-carte-didentite-valide-jusquau-31-janvier-2016 
) that "des officiers du ministère, les experts 
singapouriens et tous ceux ayant participé à 
l’exercice de destruction des données devront 
jurer un affidavit".  Are those affidavits 
available for verification or is there any 
information available for me to locate those affidavits?
Is the citizen being required by law to have 
his/her fingerprint minutiae processed?  If so, 
why does he/she have to give his/her consent for that?
I do not have any information to understand that 
fingerprint minutiae will be erased.  I am being 
asked to agree to a clause in the User 
Declaration Form when I cannot determine whether 
it is correct are not.  According to the Data 
Protection Office, the "responsibility for 
compliance with the legal requirement falls 
directly on the data controller and "the data 
controller should destroy such data as soon as 
reasonably practicable".  I have tried to contact 
the data controller for the National Identity 
Card; I did not receive any reply.  I found that 
odd given that the Code of Ethics for Public Officers states that:
   "It is the duty of Public Officers to give to the public any
    information required or advice and to provide reasonable
    assistance. Public Officers shall help the public to understand
    their rights and obligations."
Why am I being asked to state something when it 
is up to the data controller to state that it 
will be erasing the information permanently once 
the identity card has been printed?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. 
http://civilservice.govmu.org/English/Documents/administrative%20reforms/Ethics2010.pdf
Received on Fri Apr 14 2017 - 03:10:40 PST