Hi Irshaad,
Last time I was in the weekly Skype call, we discussed a bit about those 3
points. There's an article[1] on Ish's blog which relates to your third
point.
[1]
http://hacklog.in/mailing-list-netiquette/
Regards,
R.J
On 7 July 2015 at 11:06, Irshaad Abdool <irshaad_abd_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello guys
>
> I hope you are all doing good; well I know my email can be quite a tigger
> for a turmoil.. But I have some points to raise..
>
>
> 1. I agree that I am part of it too.. but, Are we participating enough
> to the mailing list to get valuable output? For example, if an issue is
> raised and only 2-3 people from the mailing list reply and give their
> opinion. At the end of the day, the issue is voted and brought forward but
> members of MIU do not agree or are not happy with it; Should they take it
> bad to be made to abide by or agree with the outcome, *prenant en
> compte*, that they have not raised their voice when the issue was in
> debate mode on the Mailing List?
> 2. What is MIU? I already know about it, but I am talking from the
> Mauritian perspective, where everything is dealt using BRN Numbers,
> Registrar's Records , etc etc. Will this be some kind of obstacle to us? *[The
> subject line is inspired from this subsection, the Mauritian way of life
> where everywhere and everything should be recorded somewhere with the
> authorities TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A STAND OR A VOICE..]*
> 3. Regarding communication on the Mailing List, should we devise and
> implement a usage policy to formalise our emails [proper language, subject
> lines, signature lines, use of reply-to-all, etc]?
>
>
> Thank You all
>
> Have a good day ahead.
>
> Regards
>
>
> *M Irshaad Abdool*
> www.irshaad.me | www.blog.irshaad.me
> facebook.com/abdoolirshaad
>
Received on Tue Jul 07 2015 - 07:43:49 PST