Re: HTTP/2

From: <cedric_at_jcplaboratory.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 05:54:23 +0000

Hello S.M,


Thanks for replying and sharing your results.


Did you notice the difference between the two latencies?

Your results for HTTP/2 shows lower latency while mine is completely different. Why is that?


>There are some techniques, which are used for testing actual usage of a protocol.


Would you please list some.




Regard,

Cédric Poottaren

Software developer

http://jcplaboratory.org






On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM -0700, "S Moonesamy" <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:
Hi Cédric,
At 23:14 29-06-2015, Cédric Poottaren wrote:
>Have you guys been following the improvements surrounding HTTP/2?

Yes.

Here are my results for the demo:

           HTTP/1.1 HTTP/2
Latency 502 ms 121ms
Load time 17.51 s 3.40s

A change to "http2://" would create software
problems. It is not related to HTML.

There are some techniques, which are used for
testing actual usage of a protocol. They may
seem humorous to the average person as he or she
might expect something serious.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Received on Fri Jul 03 2015 - 05:54:43 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Jul 03 2015 - 07:18:01 PST