On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Sun <s4ndeep1203_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ish,
>
> I don't think the number of pages should have anything to do with the
> 'engine' used to build the website.
>
> I would say Joomla is convenient for the user in this case because of the
> 'easy-on-the-eye' admin interface.
>
> Now, that said. I'm pretty sure this website was outsourced and the
> client(thecore) doesn't even care/know what CMS was used. They wanted a
> simple & easy to manage website and the Agency/Person who built the site
> judged that Joomla was the way to go since he was probably familiar with
> Joomla 1.5
>
> A lot of assumptions in here though.
>
I would second Sun on that.
Once I worked with extending the backend code of a of a high traffic
website which had grown slow, despite the increasing number of
visitors. That's my idea of web development: huge number of visitors,
and a large budget to scale the whole infrastructure :) Working on
small number of websites is not that interesting.
A friend once said "If it's a client with a small budget, I don't
allow my team to spend more than 2 hours on it".
> Thanks and Regards,
> RAMGOLAM Sandeep
> Front-end Developer - Designer - Web Enthusiast - Gamer
> Website : barfii.net
>
> On 28 May 2015 at 20:14, Ish Sookun <ish_at_hacklog.in> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Next to where I work at Ebène there is a building named "The Core". Its
>> website is thecore.mu. I visited the website and realised it had 10 pages
>> only. Was it necessary for such a website which comprises mainly of "static
>> info" to be on Joomla[1]?
>>
>> The latest version of Joomla CMS is 3.4.1. The Core is running Joomla
>> version 1.5, from what I could conclude.
>>
>> [1] http://www.joomla.org
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Ish Sookun
>>
>> - Geek by birth, Linux by choice.
>> - I blog at HACKLOG.in.
>>
>> https://twitter.com/IshSookun ^^ Do you tweet?
>
>
Received on Thu May 28 2015 - 16:58:28 PST