Hello,
I appreciate that you took the criticism constructively.
At 00:28 25-05-2015, Sun wrote:
>The question was:
The question is at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZteyO0WeEI
>We used, 3D-modelling-softwares/AngularJS/Bootstrap(very little) and
>a lot of code & ideas. No back-end - This is a portal as per the
>question, not an online service, we didn't feel we needed a back-end at all.
>
>Now, Of course I agree that this is not the best website in the
>world. But after we made the whole thing(assets & code & routing
>system), during the 24hours, its easy to overlook simple features
>like mouse hovers. If I look at the site right now, I can already
>point out several UX mistakes, but it doesn't not mean that we
>didn't deserve to win. Very few teams actually coded their website
>on the spot from scratch. hell.. we even saw a Wix website.
>
>I still think we were the best among the 19teams technically &
>graphically. Obviously there's so much that can be improved
>technically on the site we made especially while in bringing the
>different elements together. I feel that our two graphics guys were
>outstanding. All the images and videos were made right there. The
>only photo we downloaded from the internet was the photo of Lady
>gaga to illustrate a human-face in one of the videos.We also took
>inspiration from visually-impressive user-interfaces from the web
>and adapted their concept to our websites.
Thank you for explaining the above. There will be UX mistakes when
you are creating a web site in 24 hours. As I mentioned off-list the
web site reminded me of a web site which I saw years ago. I am not
inferring that your team copied the web site. I did not understand
the concept when I first looked at your web site as I didn't have any
background information. The scrollbar is an issue. The graphics are
good. The HTML code looked good. I like the trick which you used. :-)
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Received on Mon May 25 2015 - 11:52:06 PST