Re: Achievements

From: vincent pollet <vincent_at_pongosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:25:58 +0400

Hello

I think in order to get heard we have to be legitimate and to be legit we
have to represent more than 60 people sending emails.

Starting a news letter was the first step, but it has a limit.

If I search on google for "mauritius internet users" I found nothing
related to MIU. Remember Morimode? the guy was thinking we were teenager
sending angry emails...

Just an idea that is crossing my mind but what we could do is to write a
manifesto like the agile one :
http://agilemanifesto.org/

Then we go to all companies and associations asking them to backup our
objective by signing it. We create a website to get more visibility (piece
of cake) get a logo to brand our image and we finally contact the press
(when everything is done) to federate the public.

Then organizations such as ICTA, NCB and others will maybe listen as they
know that we are representing something :)

*VINCENT POLLET *| *CO-FOUNDER*

*PONGO SOFT LTD. *
EBENE CYBERCITY - MAURITIUS

e: vincent_at_pongosoft.com
m: +230 52520766
skype:vincent.pollet67


On 20 May 2015 at 20:54, Shelly Hermia Bhujun <shelly_hermia_at_hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I agree with SM and Ish, there has not been any achievement so far. How it
> helped me, was through an article in the local press about a pink tote bag
> promised to me by Morimode. It also helped me to face the legal tantrums i
> got from companies and authorities.
>
> Some people might say that the MIU is a failure. SM and Ish said that MIU
> is a failure. Why are those people still on the mailing list? There isnt
> any achievement because:
>
> 1. The MIU has reported security issues affecting websites in Mauritius;
> the reports have been ignored.
> 2. The MIU has reported a very serious security problem with .mu, the
> Government has ignored this report.
> 3. The MIU has sent representatives to workshops organised by the
> Government, the recommendations made by our representatives have been
> ignored as the Government prefer to hire foreign experts even though they
> would be getting the same recommendations.
> 4. We have reported several important websites in Mauritius such as,
> gov.mu.org, infotech.mu, mbc.mu who are below the standard. The
> Government agencies running these websites have been unable to improve the
> websites.
> 5. There is a National Internet Filtering System in Mauritius. The
> Internet Users in Mauritius have been not been informed about that. What if
> it is use to make a list of all the websites we visit everyday? or used
> against the Government?
>
> If the Government and companies in Mauritius cared about Internet Users in
> Mauritius, they would not have ignored the above problems. What is the ICT
> Advisory council doing about these blatant failures? Why do ISPs in
> Mauritius say that they care about Internet Users in Mauritius when we
> don't even have an acceptable Internet connection? As for the ICTA, do you
> think that it is acceptable that it does not consult Internet Users before
> implementing its regulations?
>
> Why is the Mauritius Research Council proposing to research seaweed
> instead of supporting research to solve problems affecting the Internet in
> Mauritius?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
Received on Wed May 20 2015 - 18:09:51 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed May 20 2015 - 18:18:05 PST