Re: Feeback Privacy Assesment App

From: Mohammad Nadim <nadim.attari_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:30:40 +0400

Hello SM, all,

_at_all: I apologise for not answering your questions / commenting on your
feedback during the w-end. In fact I was a bit ill / tired. And I was on
another project too (ParixisCMS). Surely I'll reply you all.

_at_SM: Can you tell me where the Webapp is actually hosted? Where is the
server located?

Best regards,
Nadim Attari





On 7 May 2015 at 21:26, Mohammad Nadim <nadim.attari_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Sun, Yusuf, Kritesh, Sruti, and all,
>
> I'm been busy the last 7 days. We'll be including all your feedback when
> improving the application, hopefully next week. I'll reply to the points in
> your mails during the w-end.
>
> I thank you all for the constructive feedback.
>
> Best regards,
> Nadim Attari
>
>
>
> On 4 May 2015 at 09:29, kritesh sunghoon <sodium238akadace_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Sruti Jughdharree <saisruti1501_at_gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - I do not understand why in the Compliance Assessment section, for
>>> some questions, there is only the choice between yes or no. What if the
>>> user does not know or is not sure about what to answer.
>>>
>>> ​I believe it's done in this way because it saves time, that is, it is a
>> quick way of ​obtaining answers though the answers are strict.
>>
>> Furthermore, it would be easy for the person collecting the information
>> to come to a conclusion. For example, if 1000 persons take the assessment,
>> it will be difficult for him/her(assessor) to read 1000 different answers.
>> In this case, the answers will be pretty direct and neat.
>>
>>
>>
Received on Tue May 12 2015 - 08:36:01 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue May 12 2015 - 08:45:04 PST