Re: Does it incriminate you if you re-share a sensitive doc of Facebook?

From: Beach Samurai <beach.samurai_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:35:02 +0400

Hi everyone,

The second question. However i just read that anonymous users, are given
anonymous ips and can edit or add information to wiki anonymously...

For the first question why did they put that message there in the first
place:

1) they wish to educate people on the net of internet investigation that
can be carried out. In which case they probably could but only after
bringing in some expert or after a few years of hard work.

2) They wish to scare/discourage people from sharing that document and they
do not have any such resource to carry out the investigation.....

Since ive been exposed to info on how the icta and government operates
since december.....plus since bramer have bigger fish to fry..i think they
are bluffing, second option.

Regards..
On Apr 4, 2015 10:29 AM, "S Moonesamy" <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> At 18:39 03-04-2015, Beach Samurai wrote:
>
>> If instead of sharing it ...the document was to be put on
>> wikipedia...wouldnt it be nearly impossible to trace the person?
>>
>
> There is the following sentence in the news article:
>
> "Les retracer ne devrait pas être chose difficile pour les professionnels
> du NCB et l’ICTA."
>
> Are you asking whether it would be nearly impossible for the
> "professionals" of the NCB and ICTA to trace a person who puts on document
> on wikipedia.org or are you asking whether it is possible to trace a
> person who puts on document on wikipedia.org?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 04 2015 - 07:35:17 PST