Re: Does it incriminate you if you re-share a sensitive doc of Facebook?

From: Beach Samurai <beach.samurai_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 11:44:14 +0400

Ps:we can always use tor for anonymity .....ask the ncb and icta to crack
that please...:)
On Apr 4, 2015 11:35 AM, "Beach Samurai" <beach.samurai_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The second question. However i just read that anonymous users, are given
> anonymous ips and can edit or add information to wiki anonymously...
>
> For the first question why did they put that message there in the first
> place:
>
> 1) they wish to educate people on the net of internet investigation that
> can be carried out. In which case they probably could but only after
> bringing in some expert or after a few years of hard work.
>
> 2) They wish to scare/discourage people from sharing that document and
> they do not have any such resource to carry out the investigation.....
>
> Since ive been exposed to info on how the icta and government operates
> since december.....plus since bramer have bigger fish to fry..i think they
> are bluffing, second option.
>
> Regards..
> On Apr 4, 2015 10:29 AM, "S Moonesamy" <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> At 18:39 03-04-2015, Beach Samurai wrote:
>>
>>> If instead of sharing it ...the document was to be put on
>>> wikipedia...wouldnt it be nearly impossible to trace the person?
>>>
>>
>> There is the following sentence in the news article:
>>
>> "Les retracer ne devrait pas être chose difficile pour les
>> professionnels
>> du NCB et l’ICTA."
>>
>> Are you asking whether it would be nearly impossible for the
>> "professionals" of the NCB and ICTA to trace a person who puts on document
>> on wikipedia.org or are you asking whether it is possible to trace a
>> person who puts on document on wikipedia.org?
>>
>> Regards,
>> S. Moonesamy
>>
>>
>>
Received on Sat Apr 04 2015 - 07:44:26 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Apr 04 2015 - 07:54:01 PST