Hello Beach Samurai,
I think you don't know who Jochen Kirstatter is, do you ?
And anyone who has personal problems with somebody, please write him/her a
direct message instead of ranting on this mailing list, please.
Regards,
Nadim Attari
On 27 March 2015 at 15:36, Beach Samurai <beach.samurai_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Last time there was that dude who said he came from google.com now its Mr
> Kirstatter.
> Please learn some manners in the mailing-list so others can appreciate a
> good conversation.
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden_at_gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jochen Kirstätter
>> <mscc_at_kirstaetter.name> wrote:
>> > Hi Logan,
>> >
>> > Sorry that this conversation drifts away from being emotion-free.
>> > Unfortunately, the topic is very intensive and lacks some objective
>> > argumentation.
>> >
>> > I'd be happy to have your less emotion-driven point of view to my
>> questions.
>> >
>> > [Owning multiple domains]
>> > As I'm owning, registering and managing several domains for various
>> clients
>> > I have to deal with multiple TLD registrars and even though my
>> experience is
>> > surely not representative compared to others I would like to share my
>> > experience. The registration as well as the renewal process has been
>> very
>> > easy with all them, the price information and structure was clearly
>> > communicated in all cases and the DNS records for those domains could be
>> > managed within shortest time. I'm referring to these TLDs:
>> >
>> > .mu
>> > .de
>> > .com
>> > .net
>> > .org
>>
>> Why is .mu the only one not DNSSEC-signed ? Why can't I get DNSSEC
>> protection despite having a DNSSEC-aware resolver at home/work when I
>> want to do online transaction with ib.mcb.mu ?
>>
>> Sure the service can be bought, but that does NOT solve the underlying
>> problem of arbitrary price fixing that the registrars experience, the
>> screw up of gov.mu by asking for huge amount of arbitrary money, and
>> the multiple outages of the .mu ccTLD DNS services, that SM documented
>> extensively. You ignored SM's work. You decided to focus only on this
>> small part, and CLAIM that everything is good with .mu.
>>
>> technically speaking, .mu is very weak, and is NOT aligned with Best
>> Practices.
>>
>> > .name
>> >
>> > Only exception was the very first attempt for .mu as the payment had to
>> be
>> > done by bank transfer, and therefore took some days more compared to the
>> > other ones. Apart from that, no obstacles.
>>
>> >
>> > [Racism]
>> > I'm not going to comment further on this one, except that is makes me
>> sad to
>> > have this kind of reaction from you.
>>
>> My previous message was not meant to be racist, and I apologise if it
>> hurts you. Rather, it was meant to illustrate an example. Since I was
>> 14 years old, the problem of the .mu ccTLD management was present.
>> This is a problem that negatively impacted (and still impacts)
>> Mauritius.
>>
>> We have had foreign consultants who came and left, and claimed that
>> they will solve the problem. This hasn't happen. The problem is still
>> here today.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Kind regards, Jochen
>> >
>> > Founder of Mauritius Software Craftsmanship Community
>> > http://www.meetup.com/MauritiusSoftwareCraftsmanshipCommunity/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message is strictly personal and the opinions expressed do not
>> represent those of my employers, either past or present.
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Fri Mar 27 2015 - 12:18:49 PST