Hello,
Last time there was that dude who said he came from google.com now its Mr
Kirstatter.
Please learn some manners in the mailing-list so others can appreciate a
good conversation.
Kind Regards
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jochen Kirstätter
> <mscc_at_kirstaetter.name> wrote:
> > Hi Logan,
> >
> > Sorry that this conversation drifts away from being emotion-free.
> > Unfortunately, the topic is very intensive and lacks some objective
> > argumentation.
> >
> > I'd be happy to have your less emotion-driven point of view to my
> questions.
> >
> > [Owning multiple domains]
> > As I'm owning, registering and managing several domains for various
> clients
> > I have to deal with multiple TLD registrars and even though my
> experience is
> > surely not representative compared to others I would like to share my
> > experience. The registration as well as the renewal process has been very
> > easy with all them, the price information and structure was clearly
> > communicated in all cases and the DNS records for those domains could be
> > managed within shortest time. I'm referring to these TLDs:
> >
> > .mu
> > .de
> > .com
> > .net
> > .org
>
> Why is .mu the only one not DNSSEC-signed ? Why can't I get DNSSEC
> protection despite having a DNSSEC-aware resolver at home/work when I
> want to do online transaction with ib.mcb.mu ?
>
> Sure the service can be bought, but that does NOT solve the underlying
> problem of arbitrary price fixing that the registrars experience, the
> screw up of gov.mu by asking for huge amount of arbitrary money, and
> the multiple outages of the .mu ccTLD DNS services, that SM documented
> extensively. You ignored SM's work. You decided to focus only on this
> small part, and CLAIM that everything is good with .mu.
>
> technically speaking, .mu is very weak, and is NOT aligned with Best
> Practices.
>
> > .name
> >
> > Only exception was the very first attempt for .mu as the payment had to
> be
> > done by bank transfer, and therefore took some days more compared to the
> > other ones. Apart from that, no obstacles.
>
> >
> > [Racism]
> > I'm not going to comment further on this one, except that is makes me
> sad to
> > have this kind of reaction from you.
>
> My previous message was not meant to be racist, and I apologise if it
> hurts you. Rather, it was meant to illustrate an example. Since I was
> 14 years old, the problem of the .mu ccTLD management was present.
> This is a problem that negatively impacted (and still impacts)
> Mauritius.
>
> We have had foreign consultants who came and left, and claimed that
> they will solve the problem. This hasn't happen. The problem is still
> here today.
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards, Jochen
> >
> > Founder of Mauritius Software Craftsmanship Community
> > http://www.meetup.com/MauritiusSoftwareCraftsmanshipCommunity/
>
>
>
> --
> This message is strictly personal and the opinions expressed do not
> represent those of my employers, either past or present.
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 27 2015 - 11:36:41 PST