On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Loganaden Velvindron
<loganaden_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Ish Sookun <ish_at_hacklog.in> wrote:
>> 2015-03-21 13:05 GMT+04:00 Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden_at_gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Same stand. We need employees who will need to explain themselves as
>>> to how a backdoor was found.
>>
>>
>> I asked your stand as you being the developer hired to code a plugin which
>> ultimately turned out to be a backdoor. You took the example in a different
>> direction.
>
> I am not analysing this only from a developer point of view. I am
> drawing from my experience leading projects in the African region.
>
>
>>
>> So, what willbe your stand if you're the one who'd put a backdoor there?
>
> I would think twice before inserting a backdoor, as it would
> negatively impact my reputation. That's a good way to kill my own
> career.
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With a contractor, I cannot ask him to explain himself once the
>>> contract is over.
>>
>>
>> You can sue a contractor for having put any piece of software outside what
>> was asked.
>>
>>>
>>> Sure, you can talk to SM about your ideas. However, at the end of the
>>> day, we *need* a project owner to finalise the design, drive it, and
>>> maintain it.
>>
>>
>> You spent time writing almost a dozen of emails just to finally say I can
>> talk to SM about my ideas while the original question SM asked me was if I
>> would be willing to write a document for free and I expressed my terms. Look
>> back and see what you did.
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we can approach SM to be an employee.
>>
>>
>> SM approached us for help to write a proposal. Instead of helping him first,
>> shaould we go on making a drama of who should run what and being paid by
>> whom? Is it really necessary at the moment.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We need to put a structure in place to support that employee. There
>>> should be a non-profit organization to formalise and support the
>>> process.
>>
>>
>> Damn. Buddy, you took this email back to weeks ago on something which was
>> already of the opinion of several people
>> . Do you recall SM's asking the question if anybody would object to gov.mu
>> being given for free to the Government?
>>
>> Did you understand who was giving the gov.mu domain to the Government of
>> Mauritius?
>>>
>>> The question now is who will fund this organization.
>>
>>
>> Wasn't this discussed already on the ML ;-)
>>
>
> I would estimate it to be around Rs 6,36 million rupees to fund such
> an organization at the beginning.
>
Sorry, I made 2 typos here :-)
Annual salary (2 people at the beginning) : 1,92 million.
IT infrastructure: 3.6 million
Bandwidth: Rs 360,000
Ebene lease: Rs 480,000
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ish Sookun
>>
>> - Geek by birth, Linux by choice.
>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>> |H|A|C|K|L|O|G|.|i|n|
>> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>
>> https://twitter.com/IshSookun ^^ Do you tweet?
>
>
>
> --
> This message is strictly personal and the opinions expressed do not
> represent those of my employers, either past or present.
--
This message is strictly personal and the opinions expressed do not
represent those of my employers, either past or present.
Received on Sat Mar 21 2015 - 09:56:06 PST