Re: .mu update (was: Difference between someone who works)

From: Mohammad Nadim <nadim.attari_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:14:06 +0400

On 20 March 2015 at 22:33, Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:30 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:
> > Hi Ish, Nadim,
> >
> > Ish, please do not forget the document.
> >
> > At 20:05 19-03-2015, Ish Sookun wrote:
> >>
> >> If we're to come on a consensus, I suggest the .mu problems should be
> >> studied, discussed and resolved by a team of people having hands-on
> >> experience in several of the mentioned fields; not by with whom they're
> >> affiliated to.
> >
> >
> > How much would the above cost? How long will it take to complete the
> work?
>
> That seems to be what an employee should do. I think that before we go
> to the question of actual design, we need to put a structure in place
> so that we can support such activities through remuneration.
>
> Since this is a major effort, I believe that someone should be hired,
> as that person will have to write the design, come up with an
> implementation plan, and drive it to make it real. Lastly, he will
> have to manage on how to scale it, and maintain it in the future. I
> therefore believe that someone should be hired, on a long-term basis
> to make it sustainable.
>
> I believe that SM should lead this initiative, given that
> 1) He has been heavily involved in organising and writing reports on
> the discussions.
>
> 2) He has an international experience in DNS.
>
> 3) He is a trusted community representative, whose integrity cannot be
> questioned.
>
>
> Any objection ?
>


No objection. SM is ideal for the job.

Nadim Attari
Received on Fri Mar 20 2015 - 19:14:22 PST