Re: Project owner for .mu

From: chitz <chittra.03_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 23:17:29 +0400

when can we expect "to getting something stable"?

these are only words good to tell but how do you plan to proceed to achieve
it at least if we can be briefed by the genuine parameters which you are
considering





On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mohammad Nadim <nadim.attari_at_gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 5 March 2015 at 12:07, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The government representative on the .mu select committee proposed having
>> a not-for-profit organisation as the project owner to act on behalf of the
>> local internet community.
>>
>> I would like to confirm that the Mauritius Internet Users will support
>> having "gov.mu" under the control of the government and at no cost to
>> the government.
>>
>
>
> As of now, gov.mu is a 2nd level domain (same as biz.mu or com.mu) -
> which means you buy xyz.biz.mu or abc.com.mu as well as azerty.gov.mu.
> For gov.mu, 3rd level have been "sold" to the government (whether they
> have paid or not is a different issue).
>
> Government should be able to buy gov.mu and control whatever sub-domains
> (3rd level) they want to have. Hence paying for 1 domain only. But it will
> not hurt if given for free (1 domain only) and government controls gov.mu
> and whatever sub-domains they may create. How the government manages
> gov.mu's sub-domains will be entirely their responsibility - the
> not-for-profit org ("The Trust") has to ensure that gov.mu works, without
> bothering about the sub-domains.
>
>
>
>> Does anyone have any objection to the above?
>>
>
> NO.
>
> I would also like .mu with added security (DNSSEC).
>
> Regards,
>
> Nadim Attari
>
Received on Sat Mar 07 2015 - 19:18:05 PST