Re: Project owner for .mu

From: Nayar Joolfoo <nayar_at_joolfoo.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 16:18:48 +0400

If the government is helping is get what is ours and bring it into our
country, then sell it with government doesn't makes sense.

gov.mu should be in control of government. I don't know what cost
implications it has personally. How much will the government be required to
pay if it is decided they pay? Is it per thousands or millions?

If it is for few bucks, just give it.

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 3:56 PM, chitz <chittra.03_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi SM
>
> sorry for responding late but I did not get time
>
> i have some questions
>
> 1-"The government representative on the .mu select committee proposed
> having a not-for-profit organisation as the project owner to act on behalf
> of the local internet community."
>
> will the committee be under government or independent?
>
> 2015 there will be committee assume the duration for holding .mu last for
> 5 years then if there is change in gov what happen will that committee
> still stand or changes?
>
> is it because gov has pay million to get .mu so they want it to be a not
> for profit organisation?
>
> if gov.mu was properly monitored we will not land in situations where it
> costs millions.
>
> 2. "I would like to confirm that the Mauritius Internet Users will support
> having "gov.mu" under the control of the government and at no cost to the
> government."
>
> it is a shame that in 2015 when most developing country are stepping ahead
> in IT field, Mauritius is now thinking of committee that also for having
> gov.mu under control of the government. in addition thinking about no
> cost.
>
> 3-As a security geek i feel Mauritius in regard to security is "very
> poor".
>
> 4. Even if .mu is under control of gov. does it end here itself?
> what the public benefit? what is our benefit?
>
> regards
> chitz
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:07 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The government representative on the .mu select committee proposed having
>> a not-for-profit organisation as the project owner to act on behalf of the
>> local internet community.
>>
>> I would like to confirm that the Mauritius Internet Users will support
>> having "gov.mu" under the control of the government and at no cost to
>> the government.
>>
>> Does anyone have any objection to the above?
>>
>> Regards,
>> S. Moonesamy
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Sat Mar 07 2015 - 12:19:03 PST