Hello SM,
You raised a good question. Legally speaking, it is the user's
responsibility to make sure that his connection is secure. For example,
a bank will not hold itself liable if someone has intercepted an online
transaction. If ICTA is intercepting traffic, and they accidentally
leaked something. Will ICTA be responsible for monetary loss of a resident?
Cheers,
photo
*Aditya Bholah*
Junior Data Analyst, LSL Digital, La Sentinelle Ltd.
(+230) 2068581 <tel:(+230) 2068581> | (+230) 57587306 <tel:(+230)
57587306> | aditya_at_lsl.digital <mailto:aditya_at_lsl.digital>
www.lsl.digital <
http://www.lsl.digital>
Rue Des Oursin, Tombeau Bay, Mauritius , Indian Ocean
<
http://www.facebook.com/lsldigital/>
<
http://www.linkedin.com/company/lsl-digital>
<
http://twitter.com/lsldigital/>
<
http://www.instagram.com/lsldigital/>
On 29/04/2021 3:46 pm, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Irshaad,
> At 10:50 PM 27-04-2021, Irshaad Abdool wrote:
>> I talked to some people, and asked for their opinion about that
>> paper. The thing is, only those with quite a deep knowledge about IT
>> understand really what is going to happen. For other people, they are
>> like "NSS already spies on our comms right?"?. I believe too that
>> maybe an explanation to layman would be needed as to the "dangers"?
>> of such a system in place.
>
> I would consider the risks instead of what you mentioned above. You
> may have noticed that some local businesses are moving towards online
> services. Such a change entails being confident that the risks
> between the user and the online service are manageable. The proposal
> increases the risk. Let's look at a case; an online service shows a
> transaction which the customer did not initiate. Will the customer or
> the online service be held responsible for the transaction?
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 29 2021 - 17:14:30 PST