Hi Scheherazade,
At 22:02 12-05-2016, sche_at_ict.io wrote:
>The following Consultation document
>https://www.icta.mu/mediaoffice/2007/dotmu/dotmu-public-consultation.pdf
>clearly shows the case had to be referred to the
>Supreme Court. In fact the case was withdrawn by
>the Government of Mauritius in January 2015.
>Instead, the Mauritian government and Internet
>Direct Ltd have been in discussion for an
>amicable settlement for the amount owed by the Government.
I read the Consultation document. It does not
mention any court case against the company and it
does not mention the words "Supreme Court". Is
there a source for the information about the case
being withdrawn in January 2015?
Your blog article mentions that "Internet Direct
Ltd a coupé les entrées-sorties des DNS du
portail du gouvernement mauricien". If there was
a case which has been referred to the Supreme
Court since 2007, the government could have
requested a court order for the company to
restore the services which the company was
providing. Wouldn't a business do that if its domain name is important?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Received on Fri May 13 2016 - 08:56:15 PST