Re: Notes of meeting of the Multistakeholder Forum

From: Appadoo Dave <azezezaaa_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 20:10:14 +0400

Hello

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Ish Sookun <ish_at_hacklog.in> wrote:
>
> The content you saw is exactly what SM and Benoit wrote :-)
>
Thank you for clearing this up. I was afraid for a while that the contents
of my emails were being *filtered*.

People who attended the Multi-stakeholder forum today, more precisely MIU
> representatives, were requested not to share the notes of the meeting with
> public. Some people feel uncomfortable when they get questions from public.
> Now, you know that the Mauritius Internet Users has a 'public' archive, so
> SM and Benoit are only abiding to what was requested.
>
It was of my opinion that the said forum was comprised of professionals or
experts; *relevant *questions from outside their forum wouldn't affect
their composure.
Relevant questions from the public could have lead to a more thorough
discussion on the connected topics.


> There was a comment where MIU emails were qualified as 'facebook'.

I wonder how Facebook is being perceived among certain individuals. This
may be out of context but since zero-rating services are offered for
Facebook, I were assuming that Facebook would be considered as 'normal' and
more valuable than other internet services.

Cheers,
Dave
Received on Sat Jun 13 2015 - 16:10:29 PST