Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 21:51:12 +0400
Hello,
Am still waiting for the minutes of meeting. I was wondering why you are taking so much time to send us the minutes. Usually notes are taken during the meeting. Why wasn't these notes sent soon after the meeting which was held on the 22nd of April?Are there any confidential matters which cannot be made public? If so, we would understand. However, we would be grateful if an explanation is provided.
Thank you.
From: jpp_at_legekko.info
To: benoit_at_fodytechnologies.com; loganaden_at_gmail.com; sm+mu_at_elandsys.com
CC: pgorden_at_govmu.org; mtci_at_govmu.org; spurmessur_at_govmu.org; dconhye_at_govmu.org; mauritius-internet-users_at_lists.elandnews.com; l.rampersand_at_lexpress.mu; patrice_at_defimedia.info
Subject: RE: Minutes of the meeting of the Multi–stakeholder Forum
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 23:19:49 +0400
Bonsoir Benoit,Bonsoir à tous, La proposition du 18 mars est intéressante mais pas adaptée à la demande mauricienne.On doit avoir une entité mauricienne.Le TLD et Registry doit être à Maurice. Nous avons les professionnels à Maurice pour faire ce travail.Pas besoin d’outsource… Le Gouvernement si il veut avoir le TLD .MU n’a qu’a payer le prix.Si il veut le récupérer en faisant des pirouettes, on est pas dupe. Ce que l’on veut, c’est une liberté de pouvoir utiliser le .MU comme il l’est actuellement mais avec plus d’interactivité. L’objectif d’une association des utilisateurs de l’internet mauricien est un outil qu’on doit utiliser pour le bien de la communauté internet.Le Gouvernement n’a pas à mettre son nez dans le secteur privé pour jouer le rôle de régulateur. Encore une fois, si il veut jouer ce rôle, qu’il paye…Je pense que la création de l’Association va devenir primordiale pour se faire entendre et d’utiliser les outils médias tel conférence de presse avec un dossier de presse à l’appui, pour se faire entendre comme il le faut. Très Cordialement, Jean-Philippe De : mauritius-internet-users-bounce_at_lists.elandnews.com [mailto:mauritius-internet-users-bounce_at_lists.elandnews.com] De la part de Benoit Gentil
Envoyé : lundi 4 mai 2015 21:12
À : Loganaden Velvindron; S Moonesamy
Cc : Praidy Gorden; mtci_at_govmu.org; S. Purmessur; D. Conhye; mauritius-internet-users_at_lists.elandnews.com; Lubina Rampersand; Patrice Donzelot
Objet : Re: Minutes of the meeting of the Multi–stakeholder Forum Dear Sir/Madam,
I'm the representative of the .MU Registrars. In the .MU Select Commitee, I didn't agree to the MCCI model as it is a limited membership where only organisations are members of the .MU Registry. Such a model does not represent the local internet community. It is an issue if the government is moving from the current private limited entity to a non-profit which lacks transparency.
It would have been best to have a model where the public in Mauritius could easily become members of the .MU Registry and where anyone can be elected to become board members of that organisation.
ICTA proposed in a draft document made on the 18 March 2015 to enlist Mr Chris Disspain who is an ICANN board member as a consultant. This is a conflict of interest and this is to be avoided.
Best Regards,Benoit GentilDirector 59 Sir Celicourt Antelme AvenueQuatre BornesMauritius Tel: (230) 466 0065Mob : (230) 5250 2696Fax : (230) 466 0017Website: www.fodytechnologies.comOn 04/05/2015 20:22, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:46 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:Dear Sir/Madam, I am one of the two persons representing the Mauritius Internet Users indiscussions about the .mu issues. I sent an email on 27 April to request if the Ministry of Technology,Communication and Innovation could circulate the minutes of the meeting ofthe Multi貞takeholder Forum which was held on 22 April. I did not receiveany reply. As I mentioned in my previous email, there has been concerns about themeeting of the Multi貞takeholder Forum which was held on 22 April. The lackof response from the Ministry of Technology, Communication and Innovationmight be perceived as a sign that the concerns are being ignored. Hi Mr SM, It has been discussed, and my understanding is that 3 legal councelsare working on a MCCI model currently.
(image/png attachment: image001.png)