Re: Notes of meeting of the Multistakeholder Forum

From: Benoit Gentil <benoit_at_fodytechnologies.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:40:15 +0400

Hi,

The single point of failure is that in the event of a complete failure
of the .MU (Failure of DNS servers and registry database servers), there
is currently no backup plan available to recover from such a failure. If
it happens now, people will lose their domain names.

Best Regards,
Benoit

On 22/04/2015 21:51, Shelly Hermia Bhujun wrote:
> Hello SM,
>
> Yes, i would also like to know what is the 'single point of failure' .
>
> Thank you.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:16:51 +0400
> Subject: Re: Notes of meeting of the Multistakeholder Forum
> From: nadim.attari_at_gmail.com
> To: sm+mu_at_elandsys.com
> CC: loganaden_at_gmail.com; mauritius-internet-users_at_lists.elandnews.com;
> ish_at_hacklog.in
>
> Hello SM,
>
>
>
> On 22 April 2015 at 19:58, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com
> <mailto:sm+mu_at_elandsys.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Logan,
> At 08:46 22-04-2015, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>
> Why is this issue being raised only now ?
>
>
> I guess that nobody else noticed that .mu is a single point of
> failure until I showed the slide on Page 2 at
> http://www.elandsys.com/~sm/mu-cctld-problems.pdf
> <http://www.elandsys.com/%7Esm/mu-cctld-problems.pdf>
>
>
>
> For those who don't understand, can you please explain briefly, and in
> clear words, the "single point of failure"?
>
> Regards,
> Nadim Attari
>
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 22 2015 - 19:40:36 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Apr 22 2015 - 19:45:03 PST