Hi Logan,
At 08:46 22-04-2015, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
>Why is this issue being raised only now ?
I guess that nobody else noticed that .mu is a single point of
failure until I showed the slide on Page 2 at
http://www.elandsys.com/~sm/mu-cctld-problems.pdf
>Why were we not made aware that a representative of Internet Direct
>Ltd was at this meeting ?
>
>I would also like to know what he said ?
I was not notified during the meeting that a representative of
Internet Direct Ltd was attending the meeting.
As I recall, the representative of Internet Direct Ltd did not say
anything during the meeting.
>I heard a different story: The proposal was clumsy.
Ok.
>There is NO assurance that a foreign consultant will be able to do the
>job, as he's an ICANN board member. Therefore, he's closely involved
>in management, not in technical matters.
>
>Why are people repeatedly arguing for ICANN staff ?
I don't know. The representative of the ICTA also mentioned having a
.mu Council. The .mu Select Committee did not recommend having a .mu Council.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Received on Wed Apr 22 2015 - 15:59:18 PST