Re: Project owner for .mu

From: S Moonesamy <>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:03:49 -0700

Hi Ish,
At 08:39 15-03-2015, Ish Sookun wrote:
>I do not support .mu under the current management/infrastructure
>because of various mishaps and flaws noticed in the past and very
>recently. I do not advise people with sensitive or high-availability
>services to set up under a .mu domain.
>It is not a good idea to rely on a .mu domain for Internet Banking,
>be it SBM or any other. However, I will not comment on the security
>aspect in this thread as it is a subject on its own. If anyone wants
>to know more about it please start another thread.

Thanks for the feedback.

>Let's just keep this one for the "project ownership" topic and only
>highlight the main points.


>SM, I would not rely on the "State" to be "responsive" to concerns
>;-) You should know the reasons. State officials have blatantly fail
>to "enforce" / "ensure" proper security mechanisms when it comes to
>online banking.

Yes. :-)

S. Moonesamy
Received on Sun Mar 15 2015 - 16:04:34 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Mar 15 2015 - 16:09:01 PST