On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:00 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:
>
> One of you is for the government paying and the other is for the
> government not paying. Unless someone else comments I'll say that our
> group don't have a position on this issue.
>
I consider "gov.mu" as being like sponsoring a domain :-)
It's good to sponsor the Government some times, a noble action. So, I stick
to my point, no objection for the Government not paying for "gov.mu".
If tomorrow, however, they want "supergov.mu", "awesomegov.mu" etc, they
pay for the service.
Regards,
Ish Sookun
*- Geek by birth, Linux by choice.*
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+*
* |H|A|C|K|L|O|G|.|i|n|*
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ *
*
https://twitter.com/IshSookun <
https://twitter.com/IshSookun> ^^ Do you
tweet?*
Received on Thu Mar 05 2015 - 18:06:28 PST