Re: Local press writes about the [removed]

From: S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:01:42 -0700


Hi Shelly,
At 21:25 10-04-2017, Shelly Hermia Bhujun wrote:
>Why was the part of the subject replaced by [removed] ? I read the
>article you and Ish are talking about. The [removed] part was
>mentioned in the article then why not here?

On a few occasions I may remove part of the content of a message
e.g.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg100812.html It
is a personal decision. In the current case the decision was not to
comment about that part. :-)

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Received on Tue Apr 11 2017 - 05:02:18 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Apr 11 2017 - 05:09:01 PST