Re: “Confidentiality” clause to intimidate

From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:13:34 +0000

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com> wrote:

> Hi Ish, Logan,
>
> I listened to Ish's podcast about '"Confidentiality" clause to intimidate'
> [1]. The "confidentiality" argument only works if a person is docile
> enough to accept everything which he/she is told.
>
> I am curious to know whether you signed an oath of secrecy as a political
> appointee under Section 35 of the ICT Act.
>
>
None.

If such a clause existed, I would most probably avoid signing it. I don't
believe that signing a confidentiality clause for a governmental or
parastatal body is how we want to show that transparency exists.
Received on Sun Oct 18 2015 - 18:13:46 PST