Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 22:21:20 +0400
Hi all,
An IPLookup of the resolved IP address from Shelly's ping shows that the host is in Mauritius. Is this the reason behind such a low latency?
Regards;
M Irshaad Abdoolwww.irshaad.me | www.blog.irshaad.mefacebook.com/abdoolirshaad
From: shelly_hermia_at_hotmail.com
To: sm+mu_at_elandsys.com; ish.sookun_at_lsldigital.mu; mauritius-internet-users_at_lists.elandnews.com
Subject: RE: google.mu latency
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:40:35 +0400
This is my ping test from home (St-Pierre) .
Kind regards,
Shelly
__________________________________________________________________________________________
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:45:31 -0700
> To: ish.sookun_at_lsldigital.mu; mauritius-internet-users_at_lists.elandnews.com
> From: sm+mu_at_elandsys.com
> Subject: Re: google.mu latency
>
> Hi Ish,
> At 12:57 05-10-2015, Ish Sookun wrote:
> >How are you able to get pings of 1 - 2 ms? That would be something
> >interesting to learn. Are you sitting on the Google cache server by the way?
>
> I am not sitting on the Google cache server. :-) There is a good
> physical link to the ISP's network. The "router" is not the one
> provided by the ISP. It has been designed for performance.
>
> If you are using ADSL, and you have router with such functionality,
> you can monitor the line quality to find out whether there is too
> much "noise" on the line. I would avoid a low-end "routers" as it is
> not built for performance. I would have to look at a network to
> figure out whether there is a problem or not.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>
>
(image/png attachment: Ping_test.png)