Re: .mu proposed model

From: S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:17:56 -0700

Hi Ish,
At 11:01 25-03-2015, Ish Sookun wrote:
>Indeed, that appears contradictory. I meant government-funded but
>not government-managed. Though I don't know to what extent that
>could be possible.

A person accepting money from the government would have to work in
the interest of the government. The result is that the organisation
would be government-managed.

>Otherwise, we'll have to adjust the costs to cater for the board
>expenses. This would however cause inconveniences (in terms of
>expense) with a larger board.

Assuming that the board expenses costs Rs 60,000 monthly you will
have to find Rs 720,000 a year. Is that an inconvenience? :-)

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Received on Wed Mar 25 2015 - 18:19:45 PST