Re: .mu proposed model

From: Ish Sookun <ish_at_hacklog.in>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:57:58 +0400

​Hi SM,


2015-03-25 20:44 GMT+04:00 S Moonesamy <sm+mu_at_elandsys.com>:

>
> I agree that fees are to be paid to council members as they will have to
>> dedicate their time and effort.
>>
>
> By the way, that was not included in the estimated cost.
>
>
​The cost breakdown was for .mu ccTLD operational purposes. The .mu Council
is more about policy making. Thus, taking into consideration the
participation of the ICT Ministry (through its nominated member), I think
the council should rather be Government funded.

Regards,


Ish Sookun

*- Geek by birth, Linux by choice.*
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+*
* |H|A|C|K|L|O|G|.|i|n|*
* +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ *

*https://twitter.com/IshSookun <https://twitter.com/IshSookun> ^^ Do you
tweet?*
Received on Wed Mar 25 2015 - 16:58:12 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Mar 25 2015 - 17:00:02 PST